Host: Craig Dabelstein
Music: Composed by Jeffrey A. Young
Series: The Musical Archeologist: Forgotten Ideas from Music’s Past
Episode Summary
What was the first musical instrument?
A flute? A drum? A bone? A shell? A bow-string? Or something even simpler?
In this opening episode of The Musical Archeologist, Craig Dabelstein explores a question raised by the Belgian musicologist Ernest Closson in L’Instrument de musique. Closson suggests that musical instruments are not merely tools for producing sound. They are historical witnesses: objects that reveal something about the people who made them, the materials they used, the sounds they valued, and the lives they lived.
The episode considers several possible candidates for the first instrument: whistles, flutes, bows, drums, rattles, stones, reeds, hollow logs, and the human body itself. But Closson’s most powerful idea is not that one particular object came first. It is that an object becomes a musical instrument when human intention enters the sound.
A stone becomes musical when someone strikes it in time. A seed pod becomes musical when someone shakes it for rhythm. A reed becomes musical when breath turns it into tone. Music begins not with refinement, notation, or the concert hall, but with the human discovery that sound can be shaped, repeated, shared, and made meaningful.
Source Book
The idea for this episode comes from:
Ernest Closson, The Musical Instrument as an Ethnographic Document
Translated by Craig Dabelstein
Published by Maxime’s Music
Closson’s book treats musical instruments as ethnographic documents: objects that preserve traces of human culture, migration, ritual, craft, and imagination. Rather than seeing instruments only as technical devices, Closson invites us to read them as witnesses to human history.
Buy the book: https://books.by/maximes-music
Podcast webpage: https://craigdabelstein.com/podcast/
Links
Craig Dabelstein: https://craigdabelstein.com/
Maxime’s Music: https://www.maximesmusic.com/
Maxime’s Music YouTube: https://youtube.com/@maximes-music
Credits
The Musical Archeologist is written and presented by Craig Dabelstein.
Music composed by Jeffrey A. Young.
This episode is based on ideas from Ernest Closson’s The Musical Instrument as an Ethnographic Document.
Suggested Citation
Dabelstein, Craig. “What Was the First Musical Instrument?” The Musical Archeologist: Forgotten Ideas from Music’s Past, Episode 1.
Episode 1: What Was the First Musical Instrument?
What was the first musical instrument?
It sounds like the kind of question that ought to have a simple answer.
A drum, perhaps.
A flute.
A hollow bone.
A stretched string.
A shell.
A rattle.
But the more you think about it, the stranger the question becomes.
Because before there was a violin, before there was a trumpet, before there was a piano, before there was even anything we would comfortably call a musical instrument, there was still the human desire to make sound.
Not accidental sound.
Not merely noise.
But sound made on purpose.
And perhaps that is where music begins.
This is The Musical Archeologist: forgotten ideas from music’s past.
I’m Craig Dabelstein, and in this series I want to take ideas from old books on music — many of them almost completely forgotten — and bring them back into conversation with the present.
Today’s idea comes from a remarkable little book published in Brussels in 1902 by the Belgian musicologist Ernst Closson. Its title is The Musical Instrument as an Ethnographic Document.
Closson’s argument is simple, but fascinating. He says that musical instruments are not just tools for producing sound. They are historical witnesses. They tell us something about the people who made them: what materials they had, what sounds they valued, what problems they solved, what rituals they practised, what neighbours they met, and what memories they carried.
And towards the end of the book, Closson asks one of the most basic questions imaginable:
What may the first musical instrument of mankind have been?
He immediately admits that the question is almost impossible to answer with certainty. Archaeology can only tell us what has survived. A bone flute might survive. A clay whistle might survive. A stone might survive. But a drumskin, a reed, a wooden rattle, a primitive bow-string — these could vanish completely, leaving no trace.
So if we look only at the oldest surviving objects, we may be misled. The oldest surviving instrument is not necessarily the first instrument.
Closson surveys the possibilities.
Perhaps the first instrument was a whistle. Some scholars thought so, partly because ancient whistles and primitive flutes have been found by archaeologists. A whistle is small, portable, and musically suggestive. It can signal, imitate birds, or create a piercing tone that travels across distance.
Or perhaps it was a flute. A reed, after all, is already a kind of natural pipe. The wind blowing across a hollow stem can produce a sound before any human hand has improved it. A broken reed may have been one of nature’s own demonstrations of instrumental music.
Or perhaps it was the bow. A hunter draws a string, releases it, and hears it vibrate. In that moment, a weapon reveals an unsuspected musical life. Closson finds this thought poetic: the crude instrument of death becoming the ancestor of the harp.
Or perhaps it was the drum. A stretched skin over a hollow body is one of the simplest and most widespread musical ideas in human culture. And long before there were formal drums, there were logs, stones, bones, gourds, shells, hands, feet, and bodies.
In fact, this is where Closson’s answer becomes most interesting.
He begins to move away from the question: Which object came first?
And he moves toward a deeper question: What makes an object into a musical instrument?
That distinction matters.
A hollow tree can make a sound when struck by accident. But is it an instrument?
A bone may whistle when wind passes through it. But is it an instrument?
A stretched string may vibrate when pulled. But is it music?
Closson’s answer is wonderfully broad and wonderfully human.
The first musical instrument, he suggests, may not have been an instrument at all.
It may simply have been whatever object a human being first used intentionally to produce rhythm or sound.
That word is everything: intentionally.
A stone becomes an instrument when someone strikes it in time.
A seed pod becomes an instrument when someone shakes it to accompany dancing.
A jawbone, a shell, a branch, a stretched string, a hollow reed — all of these become musical at the moment human intention enters the sound.
That means the first instrument was probably not invented in the way we usually imagine invention.
There may have been no sudden brilliant craftsman saying, “I shall now create music.”
More likely, there was play.
There was work.
There was ritual.
There was imitation.
There was movement.
There was the body.
Hands clapping.
Feet stamping.
Stones struck together.
Seeds shaken in rhythm.
A stick scraped along a notched piece of wood.
A hollow log beaten in the distance.
Rhythm, Closson reminds us, is everywhere. It is in walking, in labour, in dance, in the motion of water, in the swaying of trees, in the beating of the heart. Before melody, before harmony, before art, there is regular movement.
And perhaps music begins when human beings recognise that movement and choose to shape it.
This is a profound idea, because it shifts music away from the concert hall and places it back in the deepest layers of human life.
Music does not begin with refinement.
It does not begin with notation.
It does not begin with composers.
It does not begin with the distinction between art and entertainment.
It begins with the discovery that the world can be made to sound back to us.
And that discovery may have happened not once, but many times, in many places, with many different objects.
A person strikes a hollow log and hears not just noise, but pattern.
Another blows across a reed and hears not just wind, but tone.
Another pulls a string and hears not just vibration, but expression.
Another shakes a handful of dried seeds and hears not just rattling, but rhythm.
At that moment, the world changes.
The object is still an object.
But now it carries intention.
And that may be the beginning of the musical instrument.
What I love about Closson’s answer is that it refuses to make music too narrow. It does not say: music begins only when we have a flute, or a harp, or a drum, or a scale, or a tune. It says music begins when human beings deliberately organise sound.
That idea still matters.
Because even today, we sometimes mistake the instrument for the music.
We think music belongs to the expensive instrument, the trained player, the concert platform, the printed score, the approved tradition.
Perhaps the first musical instrument was not a flute.
Perhaps it was not a drum.
Perhaps it was not a bone, or a shell, or a bow.
Perhaps the first musical instrument was simply the first object through which a human being said:
This sound means something.
And from that moment, the history of music had begun.
